Architecture is being disrupted, and some days it feels like everything is coming apart. Even disruptors can't control the shape of disruption. But we do choose our response. I'm sharing more of my writing and speaking on AI, computation, and the tools remaking practice, in hopes of influencing your response to be calm.
Not everything here will arrive as a series, but I'm starting with a breakdown of You Are, Therefore I Am. Most of what follows will stand alone, published when it's ready. All of this is thinking in public, which means every position is a working position. Thanks for being part of the process.
I inverted Descartes' I think, therefore I am for the age of the prompt, then read the result the way scholars read scripture. One word at a time (exegesis). On the surface, it's about what we do to AI. Underneath, it's about what using AI does to us.
“The machine speaks with the voice of everyone. Our work is answering as someone.”
What we draw out of a text, and what we read into it.
forthcoming · Aug 10, 2026Care, attention, and the machines we keep running.
forthcoming · Aug 17, 2026On knowledge that used to live in a someone.
forthcoming · Aug 24, 2026Twenty minutes, five words, one argument. The machine speaks with the voice of everyone. Our work is answering as someone. For technology tracks and stages.
Agentic AI completes tasks. An agentic architect acts with purpose. A practical, tool-agnostic guide to rebuilding agency in the age of AI, with a contribution from Jordan.
Find the book ↗
The book that named the role. Who design technology specialists are, the value they bring, and how they will shape the future of practice. Jordan is a contributor.
Find the book ↗Chaos is the medium. Calm is the method. I'm curious about yours.
Every practice has its own. The workflow nobody will touch. The model that fights back. The template three people understand and one person trusts. The tool the firm bought two years ago and never opened.
That's the chaos, and I collect it. Write to me about yours. I promise I will reply.
You cannot critique and create simultaneously. Make the first mark on the page and go from there. Design is iterative, and there's only so much you can hold in your head.
Standards are a framework for achieving more, not a box to stay inside. There are many paths through the requirements, but you cannot ignore them.
The question for any AI-polished deliverable. Where in this did a human disagree? A review that can't locate the disagreement is reviewing the machine, not the designer.
I log every day from −2 to +2. The +2 days share a pattern. Creating, building, developing, connecting. Log yours →
One of my all-time favorite comedians warns about opening with this cliché. It's not a very effective way to connect with the audience, and it signals you have nothing better to say.
I feel similarly about About sections. My professional information lives on LinkedIn ↗. This section is for connecting personally and having a little fun.
So I'll start with my affinity for goats. You may have noticed the favicon. Three more goats are hiding on this site, waiting to be found. When you find one, tell me. See the herder board
Why goats, you ask? Well, the goat has been my mark since architecture school. Goats are calm on terrain that scares everything else. They are sure-footed, load-bearing, and up for the occasional playful headbutt. Meeting chaos with calm.
Enter your email to receive every published essay, and new ones as they arrive.
Prefer the source? Fork the repository ↗ It is the site's living single source of truth. Every published essay in plain text, yours to use and build on however you wish.
My goal is to connect. The best way to support me is to use and share my writing, and to add me to your network ↗. If we can't meet in person and you would still like to say thanks, you can buy me a coffee.
Buy me a coffee